The official, unofficial, and confidential negotiations between Iran and the most important powers of the time following the nationalization of oil can be considered Iran's first effective presence in international politics. The oil dispute, whi ...
The official, unofficial, and confidential negotiations between Iran and the most important powers of the time following the nationalization of oil can be considered Iran's first effective presence in international politics. The oil dispute, which ultimately led to internal tensions and the fall of Mossadegh's government, has been the subject of debate and criticism for years, but a systematic and metapsychological analysis of it has never been presented, so that it can be a beacon for political forces in the following decades and in similar conflicts. be The book is looking for a systematic and methodological answer to this important question, how, basically, with the increase of threats and proportionate incentives, the behavior of the Mossadegh government in the discussion of oil nationalization did not change seriously until the end of the government.
The current work considers the tendency to maintain ontological security in the framework of shame politics and the production of honor-oriented subjects as the reason for the feasibility and hardening of the act of nationalizing oil.
We are using technologies like Cookies and process personal data like the IP-address or browser information in order to personalize the content that you see. This helps us to show you more relevant products and improves your experience. we are herewith asking for your permission to use this technologies.
4 (0 rating by our users)
